The spirit of the Magna Carta has been kept alive for the hundreds of years after its inception. This has mostly been done by lawyers and legislators. The Magna Carta influence on the constitution as a document is an enduring significance.
The celebration of the Magna Carta should not be likened to an ignorant grasp on old constitutional relics. Neither should it be claimed that it lacks modern day relevance. Most leading legal experts can clearly attest to it being a solid foundation to the legal constitutional process.
Looking at it from many respects, this charter overcomes the distinct confinement to politics or law. It is more representative of the commitment of the monarchs, legislators as well as the judiciary to the legal process. Its implications were strongly tied to both the Australian and British constitutions. However it would be prudent to note that it resonates well with modern law still.
One of the significances of this document on the constitutionalism is largely in regard to freedom and power. Its setting largely emanates from a time in which the concentration of ultimate power was vested on a single rulers hands. Long ago the incessant conflicts of succession that preceded a king death was very unfortunate and distractive. This was before primogeniture. The precursor to its adoption in England was so as to prevent the future exploitation of the people as experienced under the Angevin Kings. With a heavily centralized administrative system on trade taxation most of these subjects demanded assurances that everything was ethically conducted not forgetting the preservation of their liberties.
This particular document emerged as a rock at a time in England when civil war was eminent. The constitution was solidly built on it as a foundation pivot that eased the situation and forever transformed the course of history. Among the areas that are consistent with modern day constitutionalism and very highly related to the international conventions on human rights.
Similarly we can relate this to 1215 whereby citizens and feudal lords in England were fed up with the then king. On losing land to the French he subjected his subjects to high taxes and oppression via power abuse. These subjects drafted the Magna Carta and compelled the king to accept or face the consequences which amounted to civil war. Despite it being more tailored to protect noblemen, in time its umbrella included all commoners too.
There was no better way in history that the rule of law or constitutionalism process has been accorded with much significance as during the manifestation of Magna Carta. Different scholars have always given their various assessments on the same, with many claiming it was due to a societal structural shift. In the end the powerful centralized administrations eventually would have to accept that the power bestowed to government should always be exercised in line with custom, principle and law.
When we view the deliberations at the European convention it is almost entirely embedded in the chapter 6. This part dwells on an individual right to be accosted with a trial that is fair, not forgetting the jurisprudence that will arise and provide more help to the judiciary in the UK to fulfill its mandate on justice administration. The emphasis on the legal process is a doctrine that outlines the limits of governmental action. It cannot be able to proceed without any form of legal authorization or arbitrarily in any respect.
The celebration of the Magna Carta should not be likened to an ignorant grasp on old constitutional relics. Neither should it be claimed that it lacks modern day relevance. Most leading legal experts can clearly attest to it being a solid foundation to the legal constitutional process.
Looking at it from many respects, this charter overcomes the distinct confinement to politics or law. It is more representative of the commitment of the monarchs, legislators as well as the judiciary to the legal process. Its implications were strongly tied to both the Australian and British constitutions. However it would be prudent to note that it resonates well with modern law still.
One of the significances of this document on the constitutionalism is largely in regard to freedom and power. Its setting largely emanates from a time in which the concentration of ultimate power was vested on a single rulers hands. Long ago the incessant conflicts of succession that preceded a king death was very unfortunate and distractive. This was before primogeniture. The precursor to its adoption in England was so as to prevent the future exploitation of the people as experienced under the Angevin Kings. With a heavily centralized administrative system on trade taxation most of these subjects demanded assurances that everything was ethically conducted not forgetting the preservation of their liberties.
This particular document emerged as a rock at a time in England when civil war was eminent. The constitution was solidly built on it as a foundation pivot that eased the situation and forever transformed the course of history. Among the areas that are consistent with modern day constitutionalism and very highly related to the international conventions on human rights.
Similarly we can relate this to 1215 whereby citizens and feudal lords in England were fed up with the then king. On losing land to the French he subjected his subjects to high taxes and oppression via power abuse. These subjects drafted the Magna Carta and compelled the king to accept or face the consequences which amounted to civil war. Despite it being more tailored to protect noblemen, in time its umbrella included all commoners too.
There was no better way in history that the rule of law or constitutionalism process has been accorded with much significance as during the manifestation of Magna Carta. Different scholars have always given their various assessments on the same, with many claiming it was due to a societal structural shift. In the end the powerful centralized administrations eventually would have to accept that the power bestowed to government should always be exercised in line with custom, principle and law.
When we view the deliberations at the European convention it is almost entirely embedded in the chapter 6. This part dwells on an individual right to be accosted with a trial that is fair, not forgetting the jurisprudence that will arise and provide more help to the judiciary in the UK to fulfill its mandate on justice administration. The emphasis on the legal process is a doctrine that outlines the limits of governmental action. It cannot be able to proceed without any form of legal authorization or arbitrarily in any respect.
No comments:
Post a Comment